Skip to main content

Building fairer foundations




Housing affects us all: whether we are paying our own mortgage or someone else's. The condition and cost of our homes impacts upon almost every aspect of life, from children's education to care for older people. 

Harrow, along with every other London borough, is in the midst of a housing crises. Harrow Council's waiting list is 4,000 long, house prices are increasingly unaffordable and rents are rising - with limited enforcement of decent standards. 

The local Conservative Administration has committed to making Harrow a fairer place. This is welcome, but to make it possible housing must be at the heart of their 2014/15 budget. 

In a letter to the Harrow Observer, published on Thursday 12th December 2013, I outlined what housing change should look like in Harrow and called for political action. 

Dear Editor

Councillor Susan Hall is right to say that Harrow Council should have a strong fairness agenda. But a budget that doesn't put housing at its heart cannot be a fair one. There are three urgent changes that must be made to address a local housing market which simply isn't working. Politicians must act.

Firstly, whilst I welcome investment to tackle beds in sheds it is simply inadequate without wider reform of the private rented sector as well. Last year a cross party review, ably chaired by Conservative Councillor Marilyn Ashton, recommended a register of landlords to drive up standards, improve security of tenure and tackle rogue landlords. This blueprint, a ‘good landlord scheme’, should be resourced and implemented in full.

Secondly, Harrow's housing waiting list is 4,000 long. Next year's budget must allocate new funding to give hope to those left lingering on lists for up to a decade. Harrow Council should investigate whether an announcement made as part of the Chancellor's autumn statement to enable local authorities to borrow more money to build could make a difference. A Local Government Association campaign calling on the Government to lift the cap on all councils borrowing to fund new housing should be given unequivocal backing.

Finally, we need a fairer planning system and more accessible housing. Recently, as reported by this paper, I supported a disabled man - Mr Caplin - challenge the Council’s planning department which appeared unresponsive to his individual care needs. No disabled person deserves to wait a year, away from their family, for permission to adapt their home. A fair council would be on the side of vulnerable people in Harrow and fast-track applications for adaptations.

Housing affects us all, impacts upon health and wellbeing, the safety of our streets, the care we give to loved ones and the education of young people - too many of whom don't have suitable space at home to study.

We cannot build a fairer Harrow without building fairer foundations. Harrow deserves a budget which takes radical action.

Yours sincerely
Councillor Ben Wealthy (Lab, Greenhill)




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Don't be poor

Following the Spring Statement in March, the Resolution Foundation published analysis estimating that another 1.3 million people would be pushed into poverty next year. Professor Michael Marmot has warned of an impending “humanitarian calamity” and argued that to deprive citizens of basic material needs robs them of their dignity. In place of a policy response to the poverty pandemic there is a void. Cue the Health Disparities White Paper (currently being drafted in the new Office for Health Improvement and Disparities). It could be out as soon as May or June, so the influencing window is narrow. The priority given, by the public and politicians, to tackling the elective backlog in the NHS is understandable. We can see it, right here and right now. However, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has also acknowledged the link between poverty and poor health and outlined his ambition to address the ‘social backlog’. Both are essential and both are connected. The Preve...

Charities, politics and pragmatism

This blog considers the parameters and possibilities for charities seeking to influence policy in the context of a looming general election. There are two broad questions for charities to think about when developing their approach to public affairs. One relates to legalities and the other pragmatism. I will briefly reflect on each in turn.  I wanted to start by making a statement that should go without saying. Attempting to improve public policy is a noble pursuit. Many undermine and belittle it, often driven by ideological or commercial interests, however this activity is vital to a thriving democracy. It should be prized; and pursued without fear or favour. It is entirely proper for charities to argue for changes in policy, regulation, law and spending. Guidance from the Charity Commission makes clear that "campaigning and political activity can be legitimate and valuable activities." Although it should not be the sole purpose of a charity and must be undertaken "only...

Beyond the roadmap

I recently returned from a COVID-secure holiday (as far as is possible) to Scotland. Preventative measures included: a private cabin on a sleeper train from London to Inverness, staying in a ‘pod’ on the Isle of Skye, eating lots of salmon (aids physical distancing), travelling by ferry (on deck) and walking and cycling (huge thanks to Andy Bike ) around North Uist (recently made famous by the Channel 4 documentary The Scottish Island that Won the Lottery ) which has a world-beating natural ventilation system (the wind) and where you are more likely to come into contact with a lamb or a loch than a human. International travel is unlikely to take off over the summer months. We all have a unique opportunity to explore Britain’s stunning coastline, countryside and cities in a safe and respectful way. This will provide a lifeline to the tourism and hospitality sectors and remind us of the adventures available closer to home. Enjoy it.  Of course, it would be naïve to romanticise the Hi...