Skip to main content

Right to Buy Back

News that half a million landlords are planning to sell their buy-to-let property, or properties, is a unique opportunity to rebuild council housing stocks. 

A significant proportion of homes in the private rented sector were built as council homes - about 38% according to Inside Housing. A recent report by Savills, commissioned the LGA, Association of Retained Council Housing (ARCH) and National Federation of ALMOs, estimates that 100,000 homes are likely to be sold through Right to Buy by 2030, with just 43,000 created in their place. 

Right to Buy discounts leave councils without the necessary funding to replace properties lost, let alone increase the number of councils homes overall. This conundrum explains the thinking behind Right to Buy Back - a scheme launched by the Mayor of London in 2021. 

As the name suggests, it gives councils the funding to purchase ex-council homes back. 1,577 properties across fourteen London boroughs are in council hands once again, contributing to achieving the Mayor's target of reaching 20,000 new council homes by 2024. 

With a sufficient national funding pot and flexibility for local authorities to borrow sensibly (this is a sound investment), Right to Buy Back could undo some of the damage done by Right to Buy and give a new generation hope that an affordable, secure and decent home is within reach. Following Scotland's example of ending Right to Buy - or at least suspending/reforming it - should be seriously considered by all political parties. 

Right to Buy Back is more than a housing policy; it is a public health policy and an economic policy too. It is both radical and practical. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Charities, politics and pragmatism

This blog considers the parameters and possibilities for charities seeking to influence policy in the context of a looming general election. There are two broad questions for charities to think about when developing their approach to public affairs. One relates to legalities and the other pragmatism. I will briefly reflect on each in turn.  I wanted to start by making a statement that should go without saying. Attempting to improve public policy is a noble pursuit. Many undermine and belittle it, often driven by ideological or commercial interests, however this activity is vital to a thriving democracy. It should be prized; and pursued without fear or favour. It is entirely proper for charities to argue for changes in policy, regulation, law and spending. Guidance from the Charity Commission makes clear that "campaigning and political activity can be legitimate and valuable activities." Although it should not be the sole purpose of a charity and must be undertaken "only...
Post a Comment
Read more

A word on libraries, if I may

I was really lucky growing up because we had loads of books at home. But books are like hugs, lie-ins and the sun (that rare yellow object in the sky, not the newspaper) - you always want more. My local authority, Harrow Council, is consulting on the closure of four libraries. One of those on the shortlist is Rayners Lane, the library of my childhood, where I attended storytime sessions before I could walk and sought solace to study for my GCSEs. The tales of our public libraries are intertwined with our own, aren't they? Anyway, I want to share some views here which would be difficult to express through a multiple choice questionnaire. Closing, or indeed cutting, something is almost always a consequence of failing to reimagine it. By shutting a service a council is rarely suggesting it is no longer needed, just that it has not been adapted to meet new and changing needs - usually for a complex combination of reasons. We should be braver in rethinking our libraries before shel...
Post a Comment
Read more