Skip to main content

Has London's commuter culture reached the end of the line?

I have to confess to not being a regular follower of the work of the Centre for Economics and Business Research - hence the reason I am writing a blog about a report they published in December 2014. I have clearly been missing out. But, we'll get to that in a bit. 

This week has been one of those weeks when you are fully alive to the frustration and futility of being a commuter in London. Hours spent uncomfortably lodged under someone's armpit listening to [insert most despised music]. Your book unreadable whilst stuck to your face. Delays to reach further delays. Arriving at work (almost on time) looking as dischevelled as you had imaged appearing by clocking off o'clock. Repeat. 

On Thursday an announcer at my local station in Metroland - a paradise constructed on the dream of living both the urban and suburban dream at once - proceeded to list the various chaos, cancellations and catastrophes of the morning. He ended with 'all other lines are running normally' - to which a sense of collective sigh echoed across the platform as people thought 'what other lines? He has just listed all the lines there are.'

Back to the excellent Centre for Economics and Business Research. Their publication Impacts of a Flexible Working Culture, produced in collaboration with Citrix, reveals some outstanding potential benefits to spending less of our lives travelling to sit in front of a different computer in a different room. 

Their study found that 96% of the UK knowledge worker population that have flexible working utilise this opportunity, whilst 83% would do so if made available to them. This could add an extra £11.5bn per year to the economy (the equivalent of 0.7% of GDP) through a more productive use of working hours. More flexible working practices could save commuters £7.1bn (money people may decide to spend in their local high street), with a reduction in commuting costs and time spent travelling - which they rightly point out has a value. 

Interestingly, more flexible working practices could also widen work opportunities for those previously excluded. The report points out that 68% of those currently unemployed, retired, caring, disabled, long-term sick or a full-time house husband/wife would be keen to start working if they were given the opportunity to work flexibly. What a brilliant way of unlocking human capital. 

I suppose my question is, should we start questioning the wisdom of London's rail rush hour? Is it worth rethinking this whole spirit crushing start and finale to our working days. At a time when leaving things - the EU, Euro 2016 etc - seems all the rage, one cannot help but wonder whether we should be ditching our oyster cards too. Romantic as it is, perhaps our commuting culture has reached the end of the line?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Charities, politics and pragmatism

This blog considers the parameters and possibilities for charities seeking to influence policy in the context of a looming general election. There are two broad questions for charities to think about when developing their approach to public affairs. One relates to legalities and the other pragmatism. I will briefly reflect on each in turn.  I wanted to start by making a statement that should go without saying. Attempting to improve public policy is a noble pursuit. Many undermine and belittle it, often driven by ideological or commercial interests, however this activity is vital to a thriving democracy. It should be prized; and pursued without fear or favour. It is entirely proper for charities to argue for changes in policy, regulation, law and spending. Guidance from the Charity Commission makes clear that "campaigning and political activity can be legitimate and valuable activities." Although it should not be the sole purpose of a charity and must be undertaken "only

It’s called ‘public’ health

In times of trauma, we look to family, friends and neighbours for solace and strength. But the nature of the COVID-19 threat, a virus transmitted through close contact with others, tested this instinct. Despite that, people emerged as one of the main tools in the response to COVID-19. Communities rallied to deliver food parcels and medical supplies, we wore face coverings to protect others and adapted our behaviour as part of a common cause to limit illness and death. One innovative approach to building and sustaining community power was the COVID-19 Community Champions Scheme . As rapidly developed vaccines offered hope, attention turned to delivering messages to diverse and disadvantaged communities that made them feel comfortable about stepping up and receiving a vaccination. The messenger was key, especially in poorer areas and particular ethic minority groups. They had to be trusted by people and rooted in their area. The idea behind Community Champions was to encourage and

Don't be poor

Following the Spring Statement in March, the Resolution Foundation published analysis estimating that another 1.3 million people would be pushed into poverty next year. Professor Michael Marmot has warned of an impending “humanitarian calamity” and argued that to deprive citizens of basic material needs robs them of their dignity. In place of a policy response to the poverty pandemic there is a void. Cue the Health Disparities White Paper (currently being drafted in the new Office for Health Improvement and Disparities). It could be out as soon as May or June, so the influencing window is narrow. The priority given, by the public and politicians, to tackling the elective backlog in the NHS is understandable. We can see it, right here and right now. However, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has also acknowledged the link between poverty and poor health and outlined his ambition to address the ‘social backlog’. Both are essential and both are connected. The Preve