Skip to main content

COVID-19: Where next for policy?


I am hoping to write some micro blogs over the coming weeks. Two rules: I must produce them in no more than fifteen minutes and they must raise more questions than answers. Expectation management done; here is attempt number one.

The future is already being written. I was struck today, as many were, by the announcement on free school meals from the Government: “the voucher scheme will not run over the summer.” This is a small amount of money. If children cannot eat, they cannot learn. Simple.

From 2010, there were lots of cuts. Few now doubt the damage it has done. The biggest mistake would be to start the public inquiry into the handling of COVID-19 from when it was first identified in China late last year. The starting point is closer to 2010 than 2010.

So, I have three main reflections.

Firstly, the policy agenda for the next decade is taking shape. There has been a tendency to separate response and recovery into different phases: they are two sides of the same coin. We are laying the foundations for the years ahead. But what do we want?

Secondly, there is no going back to how things were. There is some nostalgia in the air. It is hard to see clearly in a storm but we’re living through history and this is a reset moment. Leonard Cohen wrote that “there is a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in”.

Thirdly, as ever, tone and language matters. The political discourse is heating up and the blame game has started. We don’t have to play it though. Acknowledge the hurt, heartache and pain COVID-19 has, and will, cause. Swap the hubris for humble.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Don't be poor

Following the Spring Statement in March, the Resolution Foundation published analysis estimating that another 1.3 million people would be pushed into poverty next year. Professor Michael Marmot has warned of an impending “humanitarian calamity” and argued that to deprive citizens of basic material needs robs them of their dignity. In place of a policy response to the poverty pandemic there is a void. Cue the Health Disparities White Paper (currently being drafted in the new Office for Health Improvement and Disparities). It could be out as soon as May or June, so the influencing window is narrow. The priority given, by the public and politicians, to tackling the elective backlog in the NHS is understandable. We can see it, right here and right now. However, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has also acknowledged the link between poverty and poor health and outlined his ambition to address the ‘social backlog’. Both are essential and both are connected. The Preve...
Post a Comment
Read more

Right to Buy Back

News that half a million landlords are planning to sell their buy-to-let property, or properties, is a unique opportunity to rebuild council housing stocks.  A significant proportion of homes in the private rented sector were built as council homes - about 38% according to Inside Housing . A recent report by Savills, commissioned the LGA, Association of Retained Council Housing (ARCH) and National Federation of ALMOs, estimates that 100,000 homes are likely to be sold through Right to Buy by 2030, with just 43,000 created in their place.  Right to Buy discounts leave councils without the necessary funding to replace properties lost, let alone increase the number of councils homes overall. This conundrum explains the thinking behind Right to Buy Back - a scheme launched by the Mayor of London in 2021.  As the name suggests, it gives councils the funding to purchase ex-council homes back. 1,577 properties across fourteen London boroughs are in council hands once again, c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Charities, politics and pragmatism

This blog considers the parameters and possibilities for charities seeking to influence policy in the context of a looming general election. There are two broad questions for charities to think about when developing their approach to public affairs. One relates to legalities and the other pragmatism. I will briefly reflect on each in turn.  I wanted to start by making a statement that should go without saying. Attempting to improve public policy is a noble pursuit. Many undermine and belittle it, often driven by ideological or commercial interests, however this activity is vital to a thriving democracy. It should be prized; and pursued without fear or favour. It is entirely proper for charities to argue for changes in policy, regulation, law and spending. Guidance from the Charity Commission makes clear that "campaigning and political activity can be legitimate and valuable activities." Although it should not be the sole purpose of a charity and must be undertaken "only...
Post a Comment
Read more