Skip to main content

The Yimbys are coming

So, nimbyism works. The decades long ground war to besiege town halls with petitions, traffic surveys and legal challenges has, I know this is hard to accept, been incredibly effective in halting the cause of new homes. 

New research published by the Institute for Government confirms what we've all known for a long time. Essentially areas with high levels of home ownership tend to have lower levels of growth in new housing stock. Nimbys organise, mobilise and very often win – the findings suggest the nimby-effect could have prevented up to one million homes being built between 2001-2011. 

The report identifies a number of policy factors which give in-built advantage to nimbyism: weak or absent regional planning coordination, limited local fiscal autonomy and development control (any change of land use is subject to planning permission). Clearly a shift in power is required. 

Nimbys have fought an aggressive war over decades - fuelled by rising home ownership, a sense of entitlement to ever-increasing house prices and a fear of what is new. Powerful people with vested interests have created a distorted view about what localism means and who it should serve. There has, for too long, been only one narrative in town. Despite that fact that every home was once a new home. 

The only antidote to the nimby is the yimby (yes in my back yard). Ipsos Mori polling suggests 80% of us believe there is a housing crises. This 80% is a disparate bunch: the well-housed, the badly-housed and the homeless. But it is nonetheless a yimby coalition in the making – already being induced by positive campaigns like Yes to Homes

Nimbys have not proved to be great neighbours. The rise of the yimbys promises the coming of more progressive conversations in our communities. Change only happens when enough people talk about it and demand it, not just of politicians but of each other. The keys to solving the housing crisis are in our hands.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Don't be poor

Following the Spring Statement in March, the Resolution Foundation published analysis estimating that another 1.3 million people would be pushed into poverty next year. Professor Michael Marmot has warned of an impending “humanitarian calamity” and argued that to deprive citizens of basic material needs robs them of their dignity. In place of a policy response to the poverty pandemic there is a void. Cue the Health Disparities White Paper (currently being drafted in the new Office for Health Improvement and Disparities). It could be out as soon as May or June, so the influencing window is narrow. The priority given, by the public and politicians, to tackling the elective backlog in the NHS is understandable. We can see it, right here and right now. However, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has also acknowledged the link between poverty and poor health and outlined his ambition to address the ‘social backlog’. Both are essential and both are connected. The Preve...

Charities, politics and pragmatism

This blog considers the parameters and possibilities for charities seeking to influence policy in the context of a looming general election. There are two broad questions for charities to think about when developing their approach to public affairs. One relates to legalities and the other pragmatism. I will briefly reflect on each in turn.  I wanted to start by making a statement that should go without saying. Attempting to improve public policy is a noble pursuit. Many undermine and belittle it, often driven by ideological or commercial interests, however this activity is vital to a thriving democracy. It should be prized; and pursued without fear or favour. It is entirely proper for charities to argue for changes in policy, regulation, law and spending. Guidance from the Charity Commission makes clear that "campaigning and political activity can be legitimate and valuable activities." Although it should not be the sole purpose of a charity and must be undertaken "only...

Beyond the roadmap

I recently returned from a COVID-secure holiday (as far as is possible) to Scotland. Preventative measures included: a private cabin on a sleeper train from London to Inverness, staying in a ‘pod’ on the Isle of Skye, eating lots of salmon (aids physical distancing), travelling by ferry (on deck) and walking and cycling (huge thanks to Andy Bike ) around North Uist (recently made famous by the Channel 4 documentary The Scottish Island that Won the Lottery ) which has a world-beating natural ventilation system (the wind) and where you are more likely to come into contact with a lamb or a loch than a human. International travel is unlikely to take off over the summer months. We all have a unique opportunity to explore Britain’s stunning coastline, countryside and cities in a safe and respectful way. This will provide a lifeline to the tourism and hospitality sectors and remind us of the adventures available closer to home. Enjoy it.  Of course, it would be naïve to romanticise the Hi...