Skip to main content

How do you solve a problem like productivity?


Productivity is proving a tough nut to crack. Worryingly, there is a glaring omission from the Government’s recently published Plan. It doesn’t mention the nation’s wellbeing.  A passing word is dedicated to plans for the devolution of health powers – but nothing on the relationship between wellness, work and wealth creation. This is perhaps unsurprising. In the lead up to May’s election the Health Secretary had a favourite catchphrase. He would tell us that "a strong NHS needs a strong economy” - economy first, health second.

Actually it should be the other way round. We all know that our productivity at work suffers when we’re unwell, tired, stressed or distracted by the health of family members. Often our job is the primary source of our anxiety. During the working week we try to look after ourselves, eat fruit and vegetables, exercise, keep alcohol consumption down and go to bed early on school nights. But the strains of modern life do inevitably have an impact on our performance.

Evidence about the costs of illness to our economy is overwhelming. The OECD puts the price of mental ill health to the UK economy at £70bn – about 4.5% of GDP each year, including productivity losses and NHS services. An LSE study suggests the costs of carers leaving employment in England amount to around £1.3 billion a year, including reductions in earnings and tax receipts. Estimates of work-related ill health show it costs as much as £13.2bn. The loss of potential is infinite.

To be a productive society we need to be a well society. That means supporting carers, prioritising mental health and promoting physical activity. The Government must flip its thinking – proper health and care services – preventative and reactive - aren’t a 'nice-to-have' in good times, they are a 'must-have' to enable good times. Generous funding is not a drain on the public finances or a driver of the deficit – quality services are the lifeblood of a flourishing economy and society. They propel productivity and wealth creation.

Ultimately a narrow, austerity-based politics can’t deliver wellness or tackle the productivity puzzle. A plan without health at its heart – and a genuine invest to save agenda - is destined to fail.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Don't be poor

Following the Spring Statement in March, the Resolution Foundation published analysis estimating that another 1.3 million people would be pushed into poverty next year. Professor Michael Marmot has warned of an impending “humanitarian calamity” and argued that to deprive citizens of basic material needs robs them of their dignity. In place of a policy response to the poverty pandemic there is a void. Cue the Health Disparities White Paper (currently being drafted in the new Office for Health Improvement and Disparities). It could be out as soon as May or June, so the influencing window is narrow. The priority given, by the public and politicians, to tackling the elective backlog in the NHS is understandable. We can see it, right here and right now. However, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has also acknowledged the link between poverty and poor health and outlined his ambition to address the ‘social backlog’. Both are essential and both are connected. The Preve...
Post a Comment
Read more

Charities, politics and pragmatism

This blog considers the parameters and possibilities for charities seeking to influence policy in the context of a looming general election. There are two broad questions for charities to think about when developing their approach to public affairs. One relates to legalities and the other pragmatism. I will briefly reflect on each in turn.  I wanted to start by making a statement that should go without saying. Attempting to improve public policy is a noble pursuit. Many undermine and belittle it, often driven by ideological or commercial interests, however this activity is vital to a thriving democracy. It should be prized; and pursued without fear or favour. It is entirely proper for charities to argue for changes in policy, regulation, law and spending. Guidance from the Charity Commission makes clear that "campaigning and political activity can be legitimate and valuable activities." Although it should not be the sole purpose of a charity and must be undertaken "only...
Post a Comment
Read more

The struggle for housing freedom

Home ownership in Britain has long been synonymous with living the dream. Phrases like "an Englishman's home is his castle" capture a sentiment that freedom can be brought. Hard working families who save the pennies are rewarded with a slice of suburbia. This British Dream has sustained our social order for decades; there's usually been a majority fully signed up. The minority left have endured slums, then social housing, and now the private rented sector.  The relationship between housing and freedom is a defining one. Of course owning your own home is not the only route to housing freedom. But it is certainly the case that, particularly in the context of a deregulated private rented sector, buying a home buys you much more freedom than renting. Basic shelter isn't really a choice, or luxury, it is the foundation for living. If you don't have somewhere to lay your hat every other aspect of your life will be stifled and devalued.  Fashionable libertarians ...
Post a Comment
Read more